TY - GEN
T1 - Work in progress - Retention and application of writing skills learned in Sophomore clinic I
AU - Harvey, Roberta
AU - Kadlowec, Jennifer
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Assessment of writing and design are active areas of research in engineering education, as are issues of retention and transfer of learning. A variety of methodologies have been applied to these questions, including surveys directed to measuring design skills and rubrics describing desired textual features. Retention and transfer of learning research generally focuses on evaluating strategies for reinforcing or augmenting writing instruction in advanced engineering courses, which usually involve explicit emphasis on organization, grammar, style, and clarity. More progressive approaches recognize the rhetorical complexity of engineering writing and encompass matters of content as well. Writing in design courses has been of particular interest in this regard. The present study focuses on a junior/senior level design course. Rubrics to evaluate experimental research reports and final design reports from this course were developed. The rubrics are based on assignments and rubrics from earlier courses where students initially receive instruction and practice in experimental and design projects and the associated reports. The rubric indicators address typical elements of reports, such as adherence to format and style conventions, but also capture rhetorical strategies associated with design thinking. The presentation of this work will describe the writing assessment methodology and preliminary results.
AB - Assessment of writing and design are active areas of research in engineering education, as are issues of retention and transfer of learning. A variety of methodologies have been applied to these questions, including surveys directed to measuring design skills and rubrics describing desired textual features. Retention and transfer of learning research generally focuses on evaluating strategies for reinforcing or augmenting writing instruction in advanced engineering courses, which usually involve explicit emphasis on organization, grammar, style, and clarity. More progressive approaches recognize the rhetorical complexity of engineering writing and encompass matters of content as well. Writing in design courses has been of particular interest in this regard. The present study focuses on a junior/senior level design course. Rubrics to evaluate experimental research reports and final design reports from this course were developed. The rubrics are based on assignments and rubrics from earlier courses where students initially receive instruction and practice in experimental and design projects and the associated reports. The rubric indicators address typical elements of reports, such as adherence to format and style conventions, but also capture rhetorical strategies associated with design thinking. The presentation of this work will describe the writing assessment methodology and preliminary results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751519373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751519373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673578
DO - 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673578
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78751519373
SN - 9781424462599
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
SP - F2G1-F2G2
BT - 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference
T2 - 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference: Celebrating Forty Years of Innovation, FIE 2010
Y2 - 27 October 2010 through 30 October 2010
ER -