TY - JOUR
T1 - Waste governance and ecological identity in Maui, Hawaii, USA
AU - Howell, Jordan P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results Graduate Fellowship under grant FP91737901-0. The views expressed here do not represent the views of the US EPA. This research was also supported by a Rowan University Seed Funding Grant and the Research Program at the East-West Center in Honolulu. Mahalo to the librarians at University of Hawaii-Maui College, the Hawaiian and Pacific Collections at University of Hawaii at Manoa, and Rob Parsons, Maui County Environmental Coordinator.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Recent scholarship examining environmental governance and solid waste management (SWM) in Hawaii has demonstrated the complexities of managing refuse in a remote, ecologically sensitive archipelago. Despite decades of calls for intensive recycling, composting, incineration, and other non-landfill disposal technologies, most islands of Hawaii continue to rely on sanitary landfilling. On Maui, a minor bureaucratic scandal centered on landfill permitting triggered the formation of an ad hoc entity intended to change SWM once and for all – the Solid Waste Resources Advisory Committee (SWRAC). I mobilize scholarship on waste governance, and in particular the ‘modes of governing’ framework to interrogate the decision-making processes of the SWRAC, evaluate their outputs, and consider the reasons for their ultimately limited impact on SWM governance on Maui. Based on a close reading of SWRAC meeting minutes and documents, I identify several factors, including the lack of clear goals or targets for SWRAC activity; a flawed, consensus-oriented decision-making process; and a failure to contextualize SWM within the broader environmental and cultural terrain of Maui. Taken together, I contend that these three problem areas underline the significance of seriously incorporating and harmonizing competing conceptions of ecological identity into both the ‘modes of governing’ framework and the scholarship of environmental governance more broadly.
AB - Recent scholarship examining environmental governance and solid waste management (SWM) in Hawaii has demonstrated the complexities of managing refuse in a remote, ecologically sensitive archipelago. Despite decades of calls for intensive recycling, composting, incineration, and other non-landfill disposal technologies, most islands of Hawaii continue to rely on sanitary landfilling. On Maui, a minor bureaucratic scandal centered on landfill permitting triggered the formation of an ad hoc entity intended to change SWM once and for all – the Solid Waste Resources Advisory Committee (SWRAC). I mobilize scholarship on waste governance, and in particular the ‘modes of governing’ framework to interrogate the decision-making processes of the SWRAC, evaluate their outputs, and consider the reasons for their ultimately limited impact on SWM governance on Maui. Based on a close reading of SWRAC meeting minutes and documents, I identify several factors, including the lack of clear goals or targets for SWRAC activity; a flawed, consensus-oriented decision-making process; and a failure to contextualize SWM within the broader environmental and cultural terrain of Maui. Taken together, I contend that these three problem areas underline the significance of seriously incorporating and harmonizing competing conceptions of ecological identity into both the ‘modes of governing’ framework and the scholarship of environmental governance more broadly.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008165485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008165485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008165485
SN - 0016-7185
VL - 79
SP - 81
EP - 89
JO - Geoforum
JF - Geoforum
ER -