TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of environmental generalist species in ecosystem function
AU - Richmond, Courtney E.
AU - Breitburg, Denise L.
AU - Rose, Kenneth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
CER and DLB were supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—Coastal Oceans Program funding to the COASTES Project. KAR was partially funded by a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Estuarine and Great Lakes (EaGLe) Program through funding to the Consortium for Estuarine Ecoindicator Research for the Gulf of Mexico (CEER-GOM; US EPA Agreement R 82945801). Although the research described in this article has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, it has not been subjected to the Agency's required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. Many thanks to the Academy of Natural Sciences Estuarine Research Center for the use of facilities during this project.
PY - 2005/11/10
Y1 - 2005/11/10
N2 - We constructed a Lotka-Volterra-like competition model to study the role of environmental generalists in maintaining ecosystem function under a range of species richnesses and environmental conditions. Ecosystem function was quantified as community biomass, proportion of initial species that coexist through time, and resilience and resistance to perturbation. Generalist and specialist species were created that differed in their realized growth rates under suboptimal environmental conditions. Generalists were more tolerant of suboptimal conditions but specialists grew faster when conditions were optimal. Model simulations were performed involving generalist-only and specialist-only communities comprised of 4-100 species under constant and cyclical environmental conditions. We used pulses applied to biomass to estimate resilience and pulses applied to the environment to estimate resistance. We also simulated 4-species and 100-species mixed communities of generalists and specialists under the same cyclical environmental conditions. Analysis of model predictions was performed after all simulations reached quasi-equilibrium. Comparisons of total community biomass, proportion of initial species coexisting through time, resilience, and resistance under constant and cyclical environmental conditions showed that, in some situations, a species-poor community of generalists can have equal or greater ecosystem function than a species-rich community of specialists. Results from the mixed community simulations confirmed these results. Our analyses suggest that the environmental tolerances of species can be an important consideration in determining ecosystem function, and should be considered in asking whether all species, or certain key species, drive the positive relationship between diversity and ecosystem function.
AB - We constructed a Lotka-Volterra-like competition model to study the role of environmental generalists in maintaining ecosystem function under a range of species richnesses and environmental conditions. Ecosystem function was quantified as community biomass, proportion of initial species that coexist through time, and resilience and resistance to perturbation. Generalist and specialist species were created that differed in their realized growth rates under suboptimal environmental conditions. Generalists were more tolerant of suboptimal conditions but specialists grew faster when conditions were optimal. Model simulations were performed involving generalist-only and specialist-only communities comprised of 4-100 species under constant and cyclical environmental conditions. We used pulses applied to biomass to estimate resilience and pulses applied to the environment to estimate resistance. We also simulated 4-species and 100-species mixed communities of generalists and specialists under the same cyclical environmental conditions. Analysis of model predictions was performed after all simulations reached quasi-equilibrium. Comparisons of total community biomass, proportion of initial species coexisting through time, resilience, and resistance under constant and cyclical environmental conditions showed that, in some situations, a species-poor community of generalists can have equal or greater ecosystem function than a species-rich community of specialists. Results from the mixed community simulations confirmed these results. Our analyses suggest that the environmental tolerances of species can be an important consideration in determining ecosystem function, and should be considered in asking whether all species, or certain key species, drive the positive relationship between diversity and ecosystem function.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144554994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144554994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:27144554994
SN - 0304-3800
VL - 188
SP - 279
EP - 295
JO - Ecological Modelling
JF - Ecological Modelling
IS - 2-4
ER -