The resource curse reconsidered: Cash crops and local violence in Kyrgyzstan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is often noted in resource curse literature that agricultural economies are less conflict-prone than countries managing mobile, high-value resources. In the vast literature linking resource endowment and conflict, cash crop economies are often considered immune to civil violence, believed to stand apart from the many horrific episodes of violence and civil war centered on “lootable” wealth (such as alluvial diamonds, tin, tungsten, or other conflict minerals). But many incidents of violence- especially local violence-are in fact occurring in cash crop economies. Drawing on newspaper accounts, policy analyses, ethnographic interviews, and in-depth reports by international organizations, I examine an episode of local violence in 2010 in Kyrgyzstan. Through this case study, the article provides a better understanding of local violence in cash crop economies that can apply to other weak states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)342-358
Number of pages17
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The resource curse reconsidered: Cash crops and local violence in Kyrgyzstan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this