TY - JOUR
T1 - The moderating effects of population characteristics
T2 - a potential biasing factor when employing non-random samples to conduct experimental research
AU - Silver, Ian A.
AU - Kelsay, James D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Objectives: Due to time and financial limitations, most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conducted employing non-random sampling techniques. Although valuable, when the unique characteristics of a non-random sample unknowingly interact with the treatment, the results of the RCT could become biased. Nevertheless, the amount of bias remains unexamined. Methods: The current study evaluated if non-random sampling techniques could bias the slope coefficients of an RCT when an interaction exists between the treatment and a characteristic in the population using two simulation analyses. Results: The results suggested that the sampling distributions of slope coefficients from an RCT — across random specifications — expand drastically when (1) an interaction between the treatment and a characteristic in the population exists and (2) the non-random sample has unique scores on that characteristic. Conclusions: Considering these findings, four recommendations are made for scholars currently or intending to conduct a RCT employing non-random sampling techniques.
AB - Objectives: Due to time and financial limitations, most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conducted employing non-random sampling techniques. Although valuable, when the unique characteristics of a non-random sample unknowingly interact with the treatment, the results of the RCT could become biased. Nevertheless, the amount of bias remains unexamined. Methods: The current study evaluated if non-random sampling techniques could bias the slope coefficients of an RCT when an interaction exists between the treatment and a characteristic in the population using two simulation analyses. Results: The results suggested that the sampling distributions of slope coefficients from an RCT — across random specifications — expand drastically when (1) an interaction between the treatment and a characteristic in the population exists and (2) the non-random sample has unique scores on that characteristic. Conclusions: Considering these findings, four recommendations are made for scholars currently or intending to conduct a RCT employing non-random sampling techniques.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111582085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111582085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11292-021-09478-7
DO - 10.1007/s11292-021-09478-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111582085
SN - 1573-3750
VL - 19
SP - 107
EP - 118
JO - Journal of Experimental Criminology
JF - Journal of Experimental Criminology
IS - 1
ER -