TY - JOUR
T1 - The analysis and design of jointed plain concrete pavements with wider slabs
AU - Swarna, Surya Teja
AU - Gali, Ravi Raj L.
AU - Reddy, M. Amaranatha
AU - Mehta, Yusuf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Despite the cost-effective nature of asphalt pavements, concrete pavements are preferred for their superior serviceability. Many agencies use Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) designs with a standard slab size of 3.5 × 4.5 m, focusing on transverse cracking. However, night-time Longitudinal Top-Down Cracking (LTDC) can occur in widened slabs due to tandem and tridem axles. This study employs a Finite Element (FE) approach to assess wider slabs under various loads. Longitudinal tensile stresses at critical points were found to increase with the slab width. Therefore, the study emphasizes the need for a design approach addressing transverse and longitudinal cracking. The design of the wider slabs (4.5 × 4.5 and 5.0 × 4.5 m) is demonstrated using a case study. If the longitudinal joint in a 9.0 m slab is placed at 5.0 m from the edge, the pavement could perform better than other slab sizes. However, it is necessary to design the pavement considering both longitudinal and transverse cracking.
AB - Despite the cost-effective nature of asphalt pavements, concrete pavements are preferred for their superior serviceability. Many agencies use Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) designs with a standard slab size of 3.5 × 4.5 m, focusing on transverse cracking. However, night-time Longitudinal Top-Down Cracking (LTDC) can occur in widened slabs due to tandem and tridem axles. This study employs a Finite Element (FE) approach to assess wider slabs under various loads. Longitudinal tensile stresses at critical points were found to increase with the slab width. Therefore, the study emphasizes the need for a design approach addressing transverse and longitudinal cracking. The design of the wider slabs (4.5 × 4.5 and 5.0 × 4.5 m) is demonstrated using a case study. If the longitudinal joint in a 9.0 m slab is placed at 5.0 m from the edge, the pavement could perform better than other slab sizes. However, it is necessary to design the pavement considering both longitudinal and transverse cracking.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188420663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188420663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14680629.2024.2326542
DO - 10.1080/14680629.2024.2326542
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85188420663
SN - 1468-0629
VL - 25
SP - 2664
EP - 2684
JO - Road Materials and Pavement Design
JF - Road Materials and Pavement Design
IS - 12
ER -