TY - JOUR
T1 - The 30-item and 15-item Boston naming test Czech version
T2 - Item response analysis and normative values for healthy older adults
AU - Bezdicek, Ondrej
AU - Rosická, Anna Marie
AU - Mana, Josef
AU - Libon, David J.
AU - Kopeček, Miloslav
AU - Georgi, Hana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is the most widely used test to assess visual confrontation naming in both research and clinical settings. Recently, an abbreviated Czech version of the BNT was described. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of this new test at the item level with advanced psychometric methods to assess its equivalence with the original test. The rationale was to help busy clinicians in the differential diagnosis of language disorders. Method: We administered the BNT-30 (odd item form of BNT-60) (N = 535; 75.61 ± 9.11; 60–96 years) and shortened the BNT-15 (N = 754; 71.94 ± 7.88; 60–96 years) to a large sample of healthy older adults. Results: Significant but low associations between BNT performance and age, education, and sex were found. We found strong evidence for the unidimensionality of both BNT-15/BNT-30 versions in healthy adults (p’s <.001). Conclusion: In-depth psychometric analysis of the BNT-15 and BNT-30 Czech versions show that test stimuli function in a similar fashion as the original BNT. Normative values adjusting for the influence of age, education, and sex are provided for use in clinical settings and future cross-cultural comparisons.
AB - Objective: The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is the most widely used test to assess visual confrontation naming in both research and clinical settings. Recently, an abbreviated Czech version of the BNT was described. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of this new test at the item level with advanced psychometric methods to assess its equivalence with the original test. The rationale was to help busy clinicians in the differential diagnosis of language disorders. Method: We administered the BNT-30 (odd item form of BNT-60) (N = 535; 75.61 ± 9.11; 60–96 years) and shortened the BNT-15 (N = 754; 71.94 ± 7.88; 60–96 years) to a large sample of healthy older adults. Results: Significant but low associations between BNT performance and age, education, and sex were found. We found strong evidence for the unidimensionality of both BNT-15/BNT-30 versions in healthy adults (p’s <.001). Conclusion: In-depth psychometric analysis of the BNT-15 and BNT-30 Czech versions show that test stimuli function in a similar fashion as the original BNT. Normative values adjusting for the influence of age, education, and sex are provided for use in clinical settings and future cross-cultural comparisons.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124344384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124344384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13803395.2022.2029360
DO - 10.1080/13803395.2022.2029360
M3 - Article
C2 - 35125051
AN - SCOPUS:85124344384
SN - 1380-3395
VL - 43
SP - 890
EP - 905
JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
IS - 9
ER -