Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Temporal relationships between esophageal injury type and progression in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

  • Bharath Yarlagadda
  • , Thomas Deneke
  • , Mohit Turagam
  • , Tawseef Dar
  • , Swathi Paleti
  • , Valay Parikh
  • , Luigi DiBiase
  • , Philipp Halfbass
  • , Pasquale Santangeli
  • , Srijoy Mahapatra
  • , Jie Cheng
  • , Andrea Russo
  • , James Edgerton
  • , Moussa Mansour
  • , Jeremy Ruskin
  • , Srinivas Dukkipati
  • , David Wilber
  • , Vivek Reddy
  • , Douglas Packer
  • , Andrea Natale
  • Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Currently, little is known about the onset, natural progression, and management of esophageal injuries after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Objectives: We sought to provide a systematic review on esophageal injury after AF ablation and identify temporal relationships between various types of esophageal lesions, their progression, and clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted until September 21, 2017. All AF ablation patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 1 week of the procedure were included. Patients with esophageal lesions were classified into 3 types by using our novel Kansas City classification: type 1: erythema; type 2a: superficial ulcers; type 2b: deep ulcers; type 3a: perforation without communication with the atria; and type 3b: perforation with atrioesophageal fistula. Results: Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 4473 patients, 3921 underwent upper gastrointestinal evaluation. The overall incidence of esophageal injuries was 15% (570). There were 206 type 1 lesions (36%), 222 type 2a lesions (39%), and 142 type 2b lesions (25%). Six of 142 type 2b lesions (4.2%) progressed further to type 3, of which, 5 were type 3a and 1 was type 3b. All type 1 and type 2a and most type 2b lesions resolved with conservative management. One type 3a and 1 type 3b lesions were fatal. Conclusion: Based on our classification, all type 1 and most type 2 lesions resolved with conservative management. A small percentage (4.2% [6 of 142]) of type 2b lesions progressed to perforation and/or fistula formation, and these patients need to be followed closely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)204-212
Number of pages9
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal relationships between esophageal injury type and progression in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this