TY - JOUR
T1 - Soviet Entrepreneurs in the Late Socialist Shadow Economy
T2 - The Case of the Kyrgyz Affair
AU - Heinzen, James
N1 - Funding Information:
For their helpful comments, I would like to thank the reviewers for this journal. I would also like to thank Lisa Kirschenbaum, Adele Lindenmeyr, Robert Weinberg, Benjamin Nathans, and the participants in the Ohio State University Seminar in Russian, East European, and Eurasian History. Research for this project has been supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American Council for Learned Societies, the Kennan Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Center, and L’École des Hautes Études des Sciences Sociales (EHESS).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Supported by new archival material, this article delves deeply into one landmark criminal case to explore key aspects of the social, economic, and cultural history of illegal production and markets in the Soviet 1950s-60s. The goal of the article (and the larger project from which it draws) is to use archival research to shed light on major themes in Soviet history. It touches on three important and promising fields: Everyday life under late Soviet socialism; the vibrant history of crime and law in this period; and the history of entrepreneurial activities within the hyper-centralized state-planned economy, focusing on the dynamics of the shadow economy. The so-called Kyrgyz Affair, a famous and expansive shadow economy operation centered in clothing factories in Frunze (Bishkek), Kyrgyz Republic, is at the center of the article. I argue that the scope, sophistication, ambition, and success of this and similar operations helps us understand a significant reason why Nikita Khrushchev decided to introduce the death penalty for aggravated cases of theft of state property and bribery in 1961-62. Associated with and fully permeating the shadow economy, one sees many varieties of practices, attitudes, informal institutions and agreements, and relationships.
AB - Supported by new archival material, this article delves deeply into one landmark criminal case to explore key aspects of the social, economic, and cultural history of illegal production and markets in the Soviet 1950s-60s. The goal of the article (and the larger project from which it draws) is to use archival research to shed light on major themes in Soviet history. It touches on three important and promising fields: Everyday life under late Soviet socialism; the vibrant history of crime and law in this period; and the history of entrepreneurial activities within the hyper-centralized state-planned economy, focusing on the dynamics of the shadow economy. The so-called Kyrgyz Affair, a famous and expansive shadow economy operation centered in clothing factories in Frunze (Bishkek), Kyrgyz Republic, is at the center of the article. I argue that the scope, sophistication, ambition, and success of this and similar operations helps us understand a significant reason why Nikita Khrushchev decided to introduce the death penalty for aggravated cases of theft of state property and bribery in 1961-62. Associated with and fully permeating the shadow economy, one sees many varieties of practices, attitudes, informal institutions and agreements, and relationships.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096394053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096394053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/slr.2020.157
DO - 10.1017/slr.2020.157
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85096394053
SN - 0037-6779
VL - 79
SP - 544
EP - 565
JO - Slavic Review
JF - Slavic Review
IS - 3
ER -