Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reliability and acceptability of psychiatric diagnosis via telecommunication anti audiovisual technology

  • Paul E. Ruskin
  • , Susan Reed
  • , Ramesh Kumar
  • , Mitchel A. Kling
  • , Eliot Siegel
  • , Mitchell Rosen
  • , Peter Hauser

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The reliability of psychiatric diagnoses made remotely by telecommunication was examined. Two trained interviewers each interviewed the same 30 psychiatric inpatients using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Fifteen subjects had two in-person interviews, and 15 subjects had one in-person and one remote interview via telecommunication. Interrater reliability was calculated for the four most common diagnoses: major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, and alcohol dependence. For each diagnosis, interrarer reliability (kappa statistic) was identical or almost identical for the patients who had two in-person interviews and those who had an inperson and a remote interview, suggesting that reliable psychiatric diagnoses can be made via telecommunication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1086-1088
Number of pages3
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume49
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1998
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and acceptability of psychiatric diagnosis via telecommunication anti audiovisual technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this