Reliability and acceptability of psychiatric diagnosis via telecommunication anti audiovisual technology

Paul E. Ruskin, Susan Reed, Ramesh Kumar, Mitchel A. Kling, Eliot Siegel, Mitchell Rosen, Peter Hauser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

The reliability of psychiatric diagnoses made remotely by telecommunication was examined. Two trained interviewers each interviewed the same 30 psychiatric inpatients using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Fifteen subjects had two in-person interviews, and 15 subjects had one in-person and one remote interview via telecommunication. Interrater reliability was calculated for the four most common diagnoses: major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, and alcohol dependence. For each diagnosis, interrarer reliability (kappa statistic) was identical or almost identical for the patients who had two in-person interviews and those who had an inperson and a remote interview, suggesting that reliable psychiatric diagnoses can be made via telecommunication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1086-1088
Number of pages3
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume49
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1998
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and acceptability of psychiatric diagnosis via telecommunication anti audiovisual technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this