TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid in-person cognitive screening in the preoperative setting
T2 - Test considerations and recommendations from the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI)
AU - Arias, Franchesca
AU - Wiggins, Margaret
AU - Urman, Richard D.
AU - Armstrong, Rebecca
AU - Pfeifer, Kurt
AU - Bader, Angela M.
AU - Libon, David J.
AU - Chopra, Anita
AU - Price, Catherine C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This article was co-published in the Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (Grant no. T32-AG04963, FA) and the National Institutes of Health (grant no. R01 AG055337, CP). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Aging or the National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (Grant no. T32-AG04963 , FA) and the National Institutes of Health (grant no. R01 AG055337, CP). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Aging or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - There are few cognitive screening tools appropriate for fast-paced settings with limited staffing, and particularly in preoperative evaluation clinics. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) convened experts in neuropsychology, geriatric medicine, and anesthesiology to conduct a review of the literature and compile a comprehensive list of cognitive screening tools used within primary care and preoperative settings. This Recommendations Statement: 1. summarizes a review of the literature on existing cognitive screening tools used within preoperative settings; 2. discusses factors to consider when selecting cognitive screening tools in a preoperative environment; and 3. includes a work flow diagram to guide use of these screening measures. Methodology involved reviewing PubMed for 27 cognitive screening tools which were identified from the literature that fit inclusion criteria. Of these 27, seven tests have been used in preoperative settings and are discussed. These seven had an average administration time ranging from one to ten minutes. These seven had an average administration time ranging from one to ten minutes. Memory, language, and attention were the most commonly evaluated cognitive domains. Most had adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect cognitive impairment/dementia. While information on the psychometric properties of these tools is limited, the tools discussed are appropriate for lay examiners, are short in duration, and accessible for free or at a low cost. We describe factors that must be considered prior to instrument selection.
AB - There are few cognitive screening tools appropriate for fast-paced settings with limited staffing, and particularly in preoperative evaluation clinics. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) convened experts in neuropsychology, geriatric medicine, and anesthesiology to conduct a review of the literature and compile a comprehensive list of cognitive screening tools used within primary care and preoperative settings. This Recommendations Statement: 1. summarizes a review of the literature on existing cognitive screening tools used within preoperative settings; 2. discusses factors to consider when selecting cognitive screening tools in a preoperative environment; and 3. includes a work flow diagram to guide use of these screening measures. Methodology involved reviewing PubMed for 27 cognitive screening tools which were identified from the literature that fit inclusion criteria. Of these 27, seven tests have been used in preoperative settings and are discussed. These seven had an average administration time ranging from one to ten minutes. These seven had an average administration time ranging from one to ten minutes. Memory, language, and attention were the most commonly evaluated cognitive domains. Most had adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect cognitive impairment/dementia. While information on the psychometric properties of these tools is limited, the tools discussed are appropriate for lay examiners, are short in duration, and accessible for free or at a low cost. We describe factors that must be considered prior to instrument selection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081283826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081283826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pcorm.2020.100089
DO - 10.1016/j.pcorm.2020.100089
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85081283826
SN - 2405-6030
VL - 19
JO - Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
JF - Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
M1 - 100089
ER -