Quantifying uncertainty and confusion in land change analyses: A case study from central Mexico using MODIS data

Zachary Christman, John Rogan, J. Ronald Eastman, B. L. Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Land cover classifications of coarse-resolution data can aid the identification and quantification of natural variability and anthropogenic change at regional scales, but true landscape change can be distorted by misrepresentation of map classes. The Lerma-Chapala-Santiago (LCS) is biophysically diverse and heavily modified by urbanization and agricultural expansion. Land cover maps classified with a Mahalanobis distance algorithm and possibilistic metrics of class membership were used to quantify uncertainty (potential error in class assignment) and change confusion (potential error in land change identification). While land change analysis suggests that ~33% of the landscape underwent a change in class, led by changes from or to the mosaic class (~19% of landscape), classification uncertainty values for 2001 and 2007 were 0.59 and 0.62, respectively, with highest uncertainty among bare soil classes, and an average confusion index value of 0.65, with pixels experiencing change at 0.67 and pixels experiencing persistence at 0.61 on average. These results indicate that uncertainty and potential error in land cover classifications estimates may inhibit accurate assessments of land change. Estimates of land change may be refined using these metrics to more confidently identify true landscape change and to find classes and locations that are contributing to errors in land change assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-570
Number of pages28
JournalGIScience and Remote Sensing
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2015

Fingerprint

MODIS
land cover
landscape change
pixel
bare soil
urbanization
persistence
land

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{405e739bd2f34f8d857067b6870c270b,
title = "Quantifying uncertainty and confusion in land change analyses: A case study from central Mexico using MODIS data",
abstract = "Land cover classifications of coarse-resolution data can aid the identification and quantification of natural variability and anthropogenic change at regional scales, but true landscape change can be distorted by misrepresentation of map classes. The Lerma-Chapala-Santiago (LCS) is biophysically diverse and heavily modified by urbanization and agricultural expansion. Land cover maps classified with a Mahalanobis distance algorithm and possibilistic metrics of class membership were used to quantify uncertainty (potential error in class assignment) and change confusion (potential error in land change identification). While land change analysis suggests that ~33{\%} of the landscape underwent a change in class, led by changes from or to the mosaic class (~19{\%} of landscape), classification uncertainty values for 2001 and 2007 were 0.59 and 0.62, respectively, with highest uncertainty among bare soil classes, and an average confusion index value of 0.65, with pixels experiencing change at 0.67 and pixels experiencing persistence at 0.61 on average. These results indicate that uncertainty and potential error in land cover classifications estimates may inhibit accurate assessments of land change. Estimates of land change may be refined using these metrics to more confidently identify true landscape change and to find classes and locations that are contributing to errors in land change assessments.",
author = "Zachary Christman and John Rogan and Eastman, {J. Ronald} and Turner, {B. L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15481603.2015.1067859",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "543--570",
journal = "GIScience and Remote Sensing",
issn = "1548-1603",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Quantifying uncertainty and confusion in land change analyses : A case study from central Mexico using MODIS data. / Christman, Zachary; Rogan, John; Eastman, J. Ronald; Turner, B. L.

In: GIScience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 52, No. 5, 03.09.2015, p. 543-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying uncertainty and confusion in land change analyses

T2 - A case study from central Mexico using MODIS data

AU - Christman, Zachary

AU - Rogan, John

AU - Eastman, J. Ronald

AU - Turner, B. L.

PY - 2015/9/3

Y1 - 2015/9/3

N2 - Land cover classifications of coarse-resolution data can aid the identification and quantification of natural variability and anthropogenic change at regional scales, but true landscape change can be distorted by misrepresentation of map classes. The Lerma-Chapala-Santiago (LCS) is biophysically diverse and heavily modified by urbanization and agricultural expansion. Land cover maps classified with a Mahalanobis distance algorithm and possibilistic metrics of class membership were used to quantify uncertainty (potential error in class assignment) and change confusion (potential error in land change identification). While land change analysis suggests that ~33% of the landscape underwent a change in class, led by changes from or to the mosaic class (~19% of landscape), classification uncertainty values for 2001 and 2007 were 0.59 and 0.62, respectively, with highest uncertainty among bare soil classes, and an average confusion index value of 0.65, with pixels experiencing change at 0.67 and pixels experiencing persistence at 0.61 on average. These results indicate that uncertainty and potential error in land cover classifications estimates may inhibit accurate assessments of land change. Estimates of land change may be refined using these metrics to more confidently identify true landscape change and to find classes and locations that are contributing to errors in land change assessments.

AB - Land cover classifications of coarse-resolution data can aid the identification and quantification of natural variability and anthropogenic change at regional scales, but true landscape change can be distorted by misrepresentation of map classes. The Lerma-Chapala-Santiago (LCS) is biophysically diverse and heavily modified by urbanization and agricultural expansion. Land cover maps classified with a Mahalanobis distance algorithm and possibilistic metrics of class membership were used to quantify uncertainty (potential error in class assignment) and change confusion (potential error in land change identification). While land change analysis suggests that ~33% of the landscape underwent a change in class, led by changes from or to the mosaic class (~19% of landscape), classification uncertainty values for 2001 and 2007 were 0.59 and 0.62, respectively, with highest uncertainty among bare soil classes, and an average confusion index value of 0.65, with pixels experiencing change at 0.67 and pixels experiencing persistence at 0.61 on average. These results indicate that uncertainty and potential error in land cover classifications estimates may inhibit accurate assessments of land change. Estimates of land change may be refined using these metrics to more confidently identify true landscape change and to find classes and locations that are contributing to errors in land change assessments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938196747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938196747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15481603.2015.1067859

DO - 10.1080/15481603.2015.1067859

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938196747

VL - 52

SP - 543

EP - 570

JO - GIScience and Remote Sensing

JF - GIScience and Remote Sensing

SN - 1548-1603

IS - 5

ER -