Abstract
In a time of societal acrimony, psychological scientists have turned to a possible antidote — intellectual humility. Interest in intellectual humility comes from diverse research areas, including researchers studying leadership and organizational behaviour, personality science, positive psychology, judgement and decision-making, education, culture, and intergroup and interpersonal relationships. In this Review, we synthesize empirical approaches to the study of intellectual humility. We critically examine diverse approaches to defining and measuring intellectual humility and identify the common element: a meta-cognitive ability to recognize the limitations of one’s beliefs and knowledge. After reviewing the validity of different measurement approaches, we highlight factors that influence intellectual humility, from relationship security to social coordination. Furthermore, we review empirical evidence concerning the benefits and drawbacks of intellectual humility for personal decision-making, interpersonal relationships, scientific enterprise and society writ large. We conclude by outlining initial attempts to boost intellectual humility, foreshadowing possible scalable interventions that can turn intellectual humility into a core interpersonal, institutional and cultural value.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 524-536 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Nature Reviews Psychology |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Psychology (miscellaneous)
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology