Perceptual changes to progressive resistance training with and without blood flow restriction

Kevin T Mattocks, J Grant Mouser, Matthew B Jessee, Samuel L Buckner, Scott J Dankel, Zachary W Bell, Takashi Abe, John P Bentley, Jeremy P Loenneke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations


The purpose was to examine changes in the perceptual responses to lifting a very low load (15% one repetition maximum (1RM)) with and without (15/0) different pressures [40% (15/40) and 80% (15/80) arterial occlusion pressure] and compare that to traditional high load (70/0) resistance exercise. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and discomfort were measured following each set of exercise. In addition, resting arterial occlusion pressure was measured prior to exercise. Assessments were made in training sessions 1, 9, and 16 for the upper and lower body. Data are presented as means and 95% CI. There were changes in RPE in the upper body with condition 15/40 [-2.1 (-3.4, -0.850)] and 15/80 [-2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)] decreasing by the end of training. In the lower body, RPE decreased in condition 15/40 [-1.4 (-2.3, -0.431)] by the end of the training study. There was a main effect of time in the upper body with all conditions decreasing discomfort. In the lower body, all conditions decreased except for 15/80. For arterial occlusion pressure, there were differences across time in the 15/40 condition and the 15/80 condition in the upper body. Repeated exposure to blood flow restriction may dampen the perceptual responses over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1857-1864
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Issue number16
StatePublished - Aug 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptual changes to progressive resistance training with and without blood flow restriction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this