TY - JOUR
T1 - Patterns Linking Interpreting and Deciding How to Respond During the Launch of a Lesson
T2 - Noticing from an Integrated Perspective
AU - Wieman, Rob
AU - Webel, Corey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Researchers have generated a powerful framework that identifies three aspects of noticing students' mathematical thinking: attending to, interpreting, and deciding how to respond to student thinking. Previous research has tended to focus on evaluating how well teachers engaged in noticing, and how well they connected the different aspects of noticing. We describe a complementary way of studying the connections between different aspects of noticing, one that stresses the content of teachers noticing. We report on a study in which participants were shown depictions of students reacting to the launch of a complex task. Participants then chose among a variety of possible interpretations and teacher responses. We found that participants displayed patterns in how they decided to respond to specific interpretations. We describe some of these patterns, as well as similarities and differences between secondary and elementary mathematics teachers. We argue that developing non-hierarchical categories for interpreting and deciding how to respond to student thinking, and describing patterns linking them, reflects how teachers engage in noticing and support teachers in learning how to notice more effectively.
AB - Researchers have generated a powerful framework that identifies three aspects of noticing students' mathematical thinking: attending to, interpreting, and deciding how to respond to student thinking. Previous research has tended to focus on evaluating how well teachers engaged in noticing, and how well they connected the different aspects of noticing. We describe a complementary way of studying the connections between different aspects of noticing, one that stresses the content of teachers noticing. We report on a study in which participants were shown depictions of students reacting to the launch of a complex task. Participants then chose among a variety of possible interpretations and teacher responses. We found that participants displayed patterns in how they decided to respond to specific interpretations. We describe some of these patterns, as well as similarities and differences between secondary and elementary mathematics teachers. We argue that developing non-hierarchical categories for interpreting and deciding how to respond to student thinking, and describing patterns linking them, reflects how teachers engage in noticing and support teachers in learning how to notice more effectively.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124886124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124886124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124886124
SN - 1442-3901
VL - 21
SP - 28
EP - 50
JO - Mathematics Teacher Education and Development
JF - Mathematics Teacher Education and Development
IS - 1
ER -