Paradoxicality of Institution, De-Institutionalization and the Counter-Institutional: A Case Study in Classical Chinese Chan Buddhist Thought

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the issue of the paradoxicality of institution, de-institutionalization, or the counter-institutionalization in classical Chan thought by focusing on the texts of Hongzhou School. It first analyzes the problem of 20th century scholars in characterizing the Chan attitude toward institution as iconoclasts, and the problem of the recent tendency to return to images of the Chan masters as traditionalists, as opposed to iconoclasts. Both problems are examples of imposing an oppositional way of thinking on the Chan masters. The essay then introduces a new paradigm for interpreting the Chan attitude toward institution, the model of de-institutionalization, which borrows certain insights from Derrida's idea of the counter-institutional. However, the new model is supported by the Chan heritage of Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. This model can more consistently construe the Chan understanding of the paradoxicality of institution, the subtle Chan relationship of being "with and against" institution, and the Chan "middle way" to make institution remain open to its outside and to transformation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-37
Number of pages17
JournalDao
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Thought
Buddhist
Deinstitutionalization
Iconoclast
Institutionalization
New Paradigm
Jacques Derrida
Mahayana
Traditionalist
Middle Way
Buddhist philosophy
Heritage

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{d72c7ecfe2cd4038a0cc47c93ce805d3,
title = "Paradoxicality of Institution, De-Institutionalization and the Counter-Institutional: A Case Study in Classical Chinese Chan Buddhist Thought",
abstract = "This article examines the issue of the paradoxicality of institution, de-institutionalization, or the counter-institutionalization in classical Chan thought by focusing on the texts of Hongzhou School. It first analyzes the problem of 20th century scholars in characterizing the Chan attitude toward institution as iconoclasts, and the problem of the recent tendency to return to images of the Chan masters as traditionalists, as opposed to iconoclasts. Both problems are examples of imposing an oppositional way of thinking on the Chan masters. The essay then introduces a new paradigm for interpreting the Chan attitude toward institution, the model of de-institutionalization, which borrows certain insights from Derrida's idea of the counter-institutional. However, the new model is supported by the Chan heritage of Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. This model can more consistently construe the Chan understanding of the paradoxicality of institution, the subtle Chan relationship of being {"}with and against{"} institution, and the Chan {"}middle way{"} to make institution remain open to its outside and to transformation.",
author = "Youru Wang",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11712-011-9255-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "21--37",
journal = "Dao",
issn = "1540-3009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradoxicality of Institution, De-Institutionalization and the Counter-Institutional

T2 - A Case Study in Classical Chinese Chan Buddhist Thought

AU - Wang, Youru

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - This article examines the issue of the paradoxicality of institution, de-institutionalization, or the counter-institutionalization in classical Chan thought by focusing on the texts of Hongzhou School. It first analyzes the problem of 20th century scholars in characterizing the Chan attitude toward institution as iconoclasts, and the problem of the recent tendency to return to images of the Chan masters as traditionalists, as opposed to iconoclasts. Both problems are examples of imposing an oppositional way of thinking on the Chan masters. The essay then introduces a new paradigm for interpreting the Chan attitude toward institution, the model of de-institutionalization, which borrows certain insights from Derrida's idea of the counter-institutional. However, the new model is supported by the Chan heritage of Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. This model can more consistently construe the Chan understanding of the paradoxicality of institution, the subtle Chan relationship of being "with and against" institution, and the Chan "middle way" to make institution remain open to its outside and to transformation.

AB - This article examines the issue of the paradoxicality of institution, de-institutionalization, or the counter-institutionalization in classical Chan thought by focusing on the texts of Hongzhou School. It first analyzes the problem of 20th century scholars in characterizing the Chan attitude toward institution as iconoclasts, and the problem of the recent tendency to return to images of the Chan masters as traditionalists, as opposed to iconoclasts. Both problems are examples of imposing an oppositional way of thinking on the Chan masters. The essay then introduces a new paradigm for interpreting the Chan attitude toward institution, the model of de-institutionalization, which borrows certain insights from Derrida's idea of the counter-institutional. However, the new model is supported by the Chan heritage of Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. This model can more consistently construe the Chan understanding of the paradoxicality of institution, the subtle Chan relationship of being "with and against" institution, and the Chan "middle way" to make institution remain open to its outside and to transformation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863184010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863184010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11712-011-9255-9

DO - 10.1007/s11712-011-9255-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84863184010

VL - 11

SP - 21

EP - 37

JO - Dao

JF - Dao

SN - 1540-3009

IS - 1

ER -