TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring drug court structure and operations
T2 - Key components and beyond
AU - Hiller, Matthew
AU - Belenko, Steven
AU - Taxman, Faye
AU - Young, Douglas
AU - Perdoni, Matthew
AU - Saum, Christine
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In the past 20 years, drug courts have become a common part of criminal justice systems' responses to drug-related crime. However, systematic national research has been limited on how drug courts are specifically organized, limiting the ability of staff at individual programs to compare the structure and operations of their program to those from a nationally representative data set. Therefore, as a part of the eCourt project, a national sample of drug court coordinators was asked to rate the extent to which a set of guidelines, the "10 key components," was implemented using a 43-item self-administered questionnaire. Psychometric analyses indicated that a seven-factor solution (with 27 items) provided the best and most interpretable fit. Composite indices included eligibility and program components, therapeutic and individualized jurisprudence, team collaboration and communication, community support, data-driven program development, graduated sanctions, and defense and prosecution collaboration. Suggested uses for the findings are discussed.
AB - In the past 20 years, drug courts have become a common part of criminal justice systems' responses to drug-related crime. However, systematic national research has been limited on how drug courts are specifically organized, limiting the ability of staff at individual programs to compare the structure and operations of their program to those from a nationally representative data set. Therefore, as a part of the eCourt project, a national sample of drug court coordinators was asked to rate the extent to which a set of guidelines, the "10 key components," was implemented using a 43-item self-administered questionnaire. Psychometric analyses indicated that a seven-factor solution (with 27 items) provided the best and most interpretable fit. Composite indices included eligibility and program components, therapeutic and individualized jurisprudence, team collaboration and communication, community support, data-driven program development, graduated sanctions, and defense and prosecution collaboration. Suggested uses for the findings are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955023286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955023286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0093854810373727
DO - 10.1177/0093854810373727
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77955023286
SN - 0093-8548
VL - 37
SP - 933
EP - 950
JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior
JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior
IS - 9
ER -