TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term Outcomes of Sacral Nerve Stimulation on the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Eggers, Erica
AU - Crouss, Tess
AU - Beausang, Jasjit
AU - Smith, Devon
AU - Spector, Sean
AU - Saracco, Benjamin
AU - Adams, Amanda
AU - Dickinson, Taylor
AU - Lipetskaia, Lioudmila
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 International Neuromodulation Society
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Introduction: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has now been used as a treatment for fecal incontinence (FI) for >20 years. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the long-term efficacy of SNS on the treatment of FI. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central data bases was performed to find publications, excluding case reports, reporting outcomes of SNS treatment for FI in adults with ≥36 months of follow-up. Bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions tool. Data were summarized per reported FI-related outcomes for symptom severity and quality of life. Results: In total, 3326 publications were identified, and 36 studies containing 3770 subjects were included. All studies had a serious risk of bias. Success was variably defined by each publication and ranged from 59.4% to 87.5% for per-protocol analyses and 20.9% to 87.5% for intention-to-treat analyses. All studies reporting bowel diary data, St Mark's scores, and Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Scores indicated significant improvement with SNS treatment in the long term. Studies that evaluated quality-of-life outcomes also all showed improvements in quality of life as measured by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. The aggregate revision rate was 35.2%, and the explantation rate was 19.7%. Conclusions: Improvements in objective and subjective outcomes at ≥36 months support using SNS for the long-term treatment of FI. Interpretation of these data is limited by a lack of comparative trials and heterogeneity of the included studies.
AB - Introduction: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has now been used as a treatment for fecal incontinence (FI) for >20 years. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the long-term efficacy of SNS on the treatment of FI. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central data bases was performed to find publications, excluding case reports, reporting outcomes of SNS treatment for FI in adults with ≥36 months of follow-up. Bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions tool. Data were summarized per reported FI-related outcomes for symptom severity and quality of life. Results: In total, 3326 publications were identified, and 36 studies containing 3770 subjects were included. All studies had a serious risk of bias. Success was variably defined by each publication and ranged from 59.4% to 87.5% for per-protocol analyses and 20.9% to 87.5% for intention-to-treat analyses. All studies reporting bowel diary data, St Mark's scores, and Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Scores indicated significant improvement with SNS treatment in the long term. Studies that evaluated quality-of-life outcomes also all showed improvements in quality of life as measured by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. The aggregate revision rate was 35.2%, and the explantation rate was 19.7%. Conclusions: Improvements in objective and subjective outcomes at ≥36 months support using SNS for the long-term treatment of FI. Interpretation of these data is limited by a lack of comparative trials and heterogeneity of the included studies.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85201507621
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201507621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.06.504
DO - 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.06.504
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85201507621
SN - 1094-7159
VL - 28
SP - 715
EP - 726
JO - Neuromodulation
JF - Neuromodulation
IS - 5
ER -