TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning classification models of cognitive conditions from subtle behaviors in the digital Clock Drawing Test
AU - Souillard-Mandar, William
AU - Davis, Randall
AU - Rudin, Cynthia
AU - Au, Rhoda
AU - Libon, David J.
AU - Swenson, Rodney
AU - Price, Catherine C.
AU - Lamar, Melissa
AU - Penney, Dana L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been supported in part by: the Robert E. Wise Research and Education Institution, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Contract D13AP00008, National Science Foundation Award IIS-1404494, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grants R01-NS17950, K23-NS60660, and R01-NS082386, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Contract N01-HC25195, National Institutes on Aging Grants R01 AG0333040, AG16492, and AG08122, National Institute on Mental Health Grant RO1-MH073989, IH/NCATS Clinical and Translational Science Award to the University of Florida UL1TR000064, and the University of Florida Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration. We thank the Anoto Corporation, which from the outset of this project has generously provided technical advice and guidance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The Author(s).
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - The Clock Drawing Test—a simple pencil and paper test—has been used for more than 50 years as a screening tool to differentiate normal individuals from those with cognitive impairment, and has proven useful in helping to diagnose cognitive dysfunction associated with neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and other dementias and conditions. We have been administering the test using a digitizing ballpoint pen that reports its position with considerable spatial and temporal precision, making available far more detailed data about the subject’s performance. Using pen stroke data from these drawings categorized by our software, we designed and computed a large collection of features, then explored the tradeoffs in performance and interpretability in classifiers built using a number of different subsets of these features and a variety of different machine learning techniques. We used traditional machine learning methods to build prediction models that achieve high accuracy. We operationalized widely used manual scoring systems so that we could use them as benchmarks for our models. We worked with clinicians to define guidelines for model interpretability, and constructed sparse linear models and rule lists designed to be as easy to use as scoring systems currently used by clinicians, but more accurate. While our models will require additional testing for validation, they offer the possibility of substantial improvement in detecting cognitive impairment earlier than currently possible, a development with considerable potential impact in practice.
AB - The Clock Drawing Test—a simple pencil and paper test—has been used for more than 50 years as a screening tool to differentiate normal individuals from those with cognitive impairment, and has proven useful in helping to diagnose cognitive dysfunction associated with neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and other dementias and conditions. We have been administering the test using a digitizing ballpoint pen that reports its position with considerable spatial and temporal precision, making available far more detailed data about the subject’s performance. Using pen stroke data from these drawings categorized by our software, we designed and computed a large collection of features, then explored the tradeoffs in performance and interpretability in classifiers built using a number of different subsets of these features and a variety of different machine learning techniques. We used traditional machine learning methods to build prediction models that achieve high accuracy. We operationalized widely used manual scoring systems so that we could use them as benchmarks for our models. We worked with clinicians to define guidelines for model interpretability, and constructed sparse linear models and rule lists designed to be as easy to use as scoring systems currently used by clinicians, but more accurate. While our models will require additional testing for validation, they offer the possibility of substantial improvement in detecting cognitive impairment earlier than currently possible, a development with considerable potential impact in practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959540974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959540974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10994-015-5529-5
DO - 10.1007/s10994-015-5529-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959540974
VL - 102
SP - 393
EP - 441
JO - Machine Learning
JF - Machine Learning
SN - 0885-6125
IS - 3
ER -