TY - JOUR
T1 - It's Not Personal, It's Professional
T2 - Causes of Academic Librarian Deference Behavior
AU - McCartin, Lyda Fontes
AU - Wright-Mair, Raquel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - This mixed-methods study examined the experiences of academic librarians working in higher education, and explored how academic librarians act in response to disciplinary faculty colleagues. The study uncovers the historical context of the library profession, outlining how stereotypes of academic librarians began and how they continue to be destructive across the academy, especially to those in this profession. Even though academic librarians bring critical skillsets and vast experience to academe, findings indicate that academic librarians exhibit deference behavior when working with disciplinary faculty. This is because of existing perceptions they face that indicate they are solely in positions to support disciplinary faculty, and that disciplinary faculty are more esteemed because of credentials (i.e. doctorate), and academic rank and status. Implications for research and practice are outlined to further explore how academic institutions, and library education more broadly can help to dismantle the flawed and inherently problematic systems that contribute to deference behavior in academic librarians.
AB - This mixed-methods study examined the experiences of academic librarians working in higher education, and explored how academic librarians act in response to disciplinary faculty colleagues. The study uncovers the historical context of the library profession, outlining how stereotypes of academic librarians began and how they continue to be destructive across the academy, especially to those in this profession. Even though academic librarians bring critical skillsets and vast experience to academe, findings indicate that academic librarians exhibit deference behavior when working with disciplinary faculty. This is because of existing perceptions they face that indicate they are solely in positions to support disciplinary faculty, and that disciplinary faculty are more esteemed because of credentials (i.e. doctorate), and academic rank and status. Implications for research and practice are outlined to further explore how academic institutions, and library education more broadly can help to dismantle the flawed and inherently problematic systems that contribute to deference behavior in academic librarians.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121425261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121425261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102483
DO - 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102483
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121425261
SN - 0099-1333
VL - 48
JO - Journal of Academic Librarianship
JF - Journal of Academic Librarianship
IS - 1
M1 - 102483
ER -