Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is defibrillation testing necessary?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

With advancements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technology, the practice of performing defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at the time of implantation has been questioned. With availability of biphasic waveforms, active cans, and high-output devices, opponents claim that DFT testing is no longer necessary. Clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of ICDs in prevention of sudden cardiac death have, however, all used some form of defibrillation testing. This debate is fueled by the absence of data from randomized prospective trials evaluating the role of DFT testing in predicting clinical shock efficacy or survival. This review discusses both sides of the argument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-224
Number of pages14
JournalCardiology Clinics
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is defibrillation testing necessary?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this