TY - JOUR
T1 - Introducing the perceived role in emotional development scale
T2 - Using indirect, reflective questioning with parental caregivers
AU - Edwards, Nicole Megan
N1 - Funding Information:
Much appreciation is extended to Dr. Joan Lieber, Dr. David Cooper, and Dr. Bridget Dever for their valuable insights. Special thanks to the expert reviewers, parent volunteers, and participating Head Start mothers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The perceived role of caregivers in emotional development and behavior is not well understood. To encourage candid responses and reflective practice, I devised scenarios with the same phrasing (“How helpful would it be if a [caregiver] of a same-age child were to [spank]…”). Scale items were grounded in the literature, pretested by expert reviewers and mothers, and rated by 114 mothers from a low-income Head Start program. I found within-group variability in parental beliefs about their role in emotional development (e.g., if helpful to offer words aligned with feelings, yell, use emotion pictures, or expect a preschool child to cope with negative stimuli). Preliminary data suggest indirect, reflective questioning was well-received and informative. Implications are discussed, including the need to explore diverse caregivers’ perceived role in emotional development and the potential for this line of questioning to serve as a screening tool to inform more tailored parental outreach.
AB - The perceived role of caregivers in emotional development and behavior is not well understood. To encourage candid responses and reflective practice, I devised scenarios with the same phrasing (“How helpful would it be if a [caregiver] of a same-age child were to [spank]…”). Scale items were grounded in the literature, pretested by expert reviewers and mothers, and rated by 114 mothers from a low-income Head Start program. I found within-group variability in parental beliefs about their role in emotional development (e.g., if helpful to offer words aligned with feelings, yell, use emotion pictures, or expect a preschool child to cope with negative stimuli). Preliminary data suggest indirect, reflective questioning was well-received and informative. Implications are discussed, including the need to explore diverse caregivers’ perceived role in emotional development and the potential for this line of questioning to serve as a screening tool to inform more tailored parental outreach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078964601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078964601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10888691.2019.1693271
DO - 10.1080/10888691.2019.1693271
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078964601
SN - 1088-8691
VL - 26
SP - 57
EP - 73
JO - Applied Developmental Science
JF - Applied Developmental Science
IS - 1
ER -