Interfacial bond strength of electrophoretically deposited hydroxyapatite coatings on metals

M. Wei, A. J. Ruys, M. V. Swain, S. H. Kim, B. K. Milthorpe, C. C. Sorrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

156 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HAp) coatings were deposited onto substrates of metal biomaterials (Ti, Ti6Al4V, and 316L stainless steel) by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). Only ultra-high surface area HAp powder, prepared by the metathesis method (10Ca(NO3)2 + 6(NH4)2HPO4 + 8NH4OH), could produce dense coatings when sintered at 875-1000°C. Single EPD coatings cracked during sintering owing to the 15-18% sintering shrinkage, but the HAp did not decompose. The use of dual coatings (coat, sinter, coat, sinter) resolved the cracking problem. Scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) inspection revealed that the second coating filled in the 'valleys' in the cracks of the first coating. The interfacial shear strength of the dual coatings was found, by ASTM F1044-87, to be ~ 12 MPa on a titanium substrate and ~ 22 MPa on 316L stainless steel, comparing quite favorably with the 34 MPa benchmark (the shear strength of bovine cortical bone was found to be 34 MPa). Stainless steel gave the better result since α-316L (20.5 μm mK-1) > α-HAp (~ 14 μm mK-1), resulting in residual compressive stresses in the coating, whereas α-titanium (~ 10.3 μm mK-1) < α-HAp, resulting in residual tensile stresses in the coating.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-409
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interfacial bond strength of electrophoretically deposited hydroxyapatite coatings on metals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this