Abstract
This article examines implications of computer-sifted information: What happens when that information is reshuffled and used for other purposes than originally intended? Historical concepts of the philosophy of privacy are examined, essentially to demonstrate that a lack of clear precedent further confuses a fast-changing situation. The author argues that, a 100-odd years ago, advancing media technology prompted Louis Brandeis to proclaim a right to be let alone—but in the intervening years we have not been particularly effective in developing proactive ethics and policy to deal with privacy issues. One case, a bill to restrict access to motor vehicle information, is cited as an example of proactive legislation; without advocating specific legislation, the author calls for increased foresight in the issue of technology and privacy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 135-144 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Mass Media Ethics |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 1994 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Communication
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Information Age Ethics: Privacy Ground Rules for Navigating in Cyberspace'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver