Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

Prashant Shirodkar; Khyati Sonpal; Yusuf Mehta; Aaron Nolan; Alan Norton; Christopher Tomlinson

doi:10.1061/41104(377)10

Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

Prashant Shirodkar, Khyati Sonpal, Yusuf Mehta, Aaron Nolan, Alan Norton, Christopher Tomlinson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to capture variability from different extraction and recovery procedures. In recent years, state agencies emphasize on grading plants depending upon their RAP stockpile variability. Depending upon this grading of the plants, maximum allowable percentage of RAP for the plants will be determined. The recent NCHRP 9-33 manual "Mix design manual for Hot Mix Asphalt" gives procedure to determine RAP stockpile variability. The different extraction and recovery methods give different allowable percentage of RAP. This paper evaluates impact of different extraction recovery procedure on RAP binder property and allowable percentage of RAP which is determined by considering RAP aggregate gradation and RAP binder content. Selection of appropriate combination of extraction recovery method will not only grade the plant on uniform basis but also lead to more precise determination of allowable percentage of RAP.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference
Pages	75-81
Number of pages	7
Edition	203 GSP
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1061/41104(377)10
State	Published - 2010
Externally published	Yes
Event	2010 GeoShanghai International Conference - Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Shanghai, China Duration: Jun 3 2010 → Jun 5 2010

Publication series

Name	Geotechnical Special Publication
Number	203 GSP
ISSN (Print)	0895-0563

Other

Other	2010 GeoShanghai International Conference - Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis
Country/Territory	China
City	Shanghai
Period	6/3/10 → 6/5/10

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Civil and Structural Engineering
Architecture
Building and Construction
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Access to Document

10.1061/41104(377)10

Cite this

Shirodkar, P., Sonpal, K., Mehta, Y., Nolan, A., Norton, A., & Tomlinson, C. (2010). Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP). In Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference (203 GSP ed., pp. 75-81). (Geotechnical Special Publication; No. 203 GSP). https://doi.org/10.1061/41104(377)10

@inproceedings{cd83417f2a0b48c59f704e8cc7329c66,

title = "Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)",

abstract = "The objective of this paper is to capture variability from different extraction and recovery procedures. In recent years, state agencies emphasize on grading plants depending upon their RAP stockpile variability. Depending upon this grading of the plants, maximum allowable percentage of RAP for the plants will be determined. The recent NCHRP 9-33 manual {"}Mix design manual for Hot Mix Asphalt{"} gives procedure to determine RAP stockpile variability. The different extraction and recovery methods give different allowable percentage of RAP. This paper evaluates impact of different extraction recovery procedure on RAP binder property and allowable percentage of RAP which is determined by considering RAP aggregate gradation and RAP binder content. Selection of appropriate combination of extraction recovery method will not only grade the plant on uniform basis but also lead to more precise determination of allowable percentage of RAP.",

author = "Prashant Shirodkar and Khyati Sonpal and Yusuf Mehta and Aaron Nolan and Alan Norton and Christopher Tomlinson",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1061/41104(377)10",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9780784411049",

series = "Geotechnical Special Publication",

number = "203 GSP",

pages = "75--81",

booktitle = "Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference",

edition = "203 GSP",

note = "2010 GeoShanghai International Conference - Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis ; Conference date: 03-06-2010 Through 05-06-2010",

}

Shirodkar, P, Sonpal, K, Mehta, Y, Nolan, A, Norton, A & Tomlinson, C 2010, Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP). in Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference. 203 GSP edn, Geotechnical Special Publication, no. 203 GSP, pp. 75-81, 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference - Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis, Shanghai, China, 6/3/10. https://doi.org/10.1061/41104(377)10

Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP). / Shirodkar, Prashant; Sonpal, Khyati; Mehta, Yusuf et al.
Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference. 203 GSP. ed. 2010. p. 75-81 (Geotechnical Special Publication; No. 203 GSP).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

AU - Shirodkar, Prashant

AU - Sonpal, Khyati

AU - Mehta, Yusuf

AU - Nolan, Aaron

AU - Norton, Alan

AU - Tomlinson, Christopher

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The objective of this paper is to capture variability from different extraction and recovery procedures. In recent years, state agencies emphasize on grading plants depending upon their RAP stockpile variability. Depending upon this grading of the plants, maximum allowable percentage of RAP for the plants will be determined. The recent NCHRP 9-33 manual "Mix design manual for Hot Mix Asphalt" gives procedure to determine RAP stockpile variability. The different extraction and recovery methods give different allowable percentage of RAP. This paper evaluates impact of different extraction recovery procedure on RAP binder property and allowable percentage of RAP which is determined by considering RAP aggregate gradation and RAP binder content. Selection of appropriate combination of extraction recovery method will not only grade the plant on uniform basis but also lead to more precise determination of allowable percentage of RAP.

AB - The objective of this paper is to capture variability from different extraction and recovery procedures. In recent years, state agencies emphasize on grading plants depending upon their RAP stockpile variability. Depending upon this grading of the plants, maximum allowable percentage of RAP for the plants will be determined. The recent NCHRP 9-33 manual "Mix design manual for Hot Mix Asphalt" gives procedure to determine RAP stockpile variability. The different extraction and recovery methods give different allowable percentage of RAP. This paper evaluates impact of different extraction recovery procedure on RAP binder property and allowable percentage of RAP which is determined by considering RAP aggregate gradation and RAP binder content. Selection of appropriate combination of extraction recovery method will not only grade the plant on uniform basis but also lead to more precise determination of allowable percentage of RAP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956169205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956169205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41104(377)10

DO - 10.1061/41104(377)10

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:77956169205

SN - 9780784411049

T3 - Geotechnical Special Publication

SP - 75

EP - 81

BT - Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference

T2 - 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference - Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis

Y2 - 3 June 2010 through 5 June 2010

ER -

Shirodkar P, Sonpal K, Mehta Y, Nolan A, Norton A, Tomlinson C. Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP). In Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis - Proceedings of the 2010 GeoShanghai International Conference. 203 GSP ed. 2010. p. 75-81. (Geotechnical Special Publication; 203 GSP). doi: 10.1061/41104(377)10

Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

Abstract

Publication series

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Center for Research and Education in Advanced Transportation Engineering Systems (CREATES)

Cite this

Impact of different extraction recovery method on allowable percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

Abstract

Publication series

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Equipment

Center for Research and Education in Advanced Transportation Engineering Systems (CREATES)

Cite this