How master frames mislead: The division and eclipse of nationalist movements in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines how a successful master frame in one location can promote mobilization failure in another by misleading movement entrepreneurs. It revisits two cases of low nationalist mobilization in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to demonstrate that a fuller explanation should include the tactical choices - good and bad - of movement leaders. In both cases, a transnational anti-imperial master frame misled separatist nationalists, causing them to undervalue critical shifts in the political environments in their republics. In Uzbekistan, this frame left the Birlik nationalist movement open to division by the state in the aftermath of inter-ethnic violence, while it made Tajikistan's Rastokhez movement susceptible to eclipse by regionalist mobilization in Tajikistan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)716-738
Number of pages23
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
mobilization
entrepreneur
republic
leader
violence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{73e9e02a92c14b29b64b5d26f2704099,
title = "How master frames mislead: The division and eclipse of nationalist movements in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan",
abstract = "This article examines how a successful master frame in one location can promote mobilization failure in another by misleading movement entrepreneurs. It revisits two cases of low nationalist mobilization in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to demonstrate that a fuller explanation should include the tactical choices - good and bad - of movement leaders. In both cases, a transnational anti-imperial master frame misled separatist nationalists, causing them to undervalue critical shifts in the political environments in their republics. In Uzbekistan, this frame left the Birlik nationalist movement open to division by the state in the aftermath of inter-ethnic violence, while it made Tajikistan's Rastokhez movement susceptible to eclipse by regionalist mobilization in Tajikistan.",
author = "Lawrence Markowitz",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01419870801961508",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "716--738",
journal = "Ethnic and Racial Studies",
issn = "0141-9870",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

How master frames mislead : The division and eclipse of nationalist movements in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. / Markowitz, Lawrence.

In: Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.05.2009, p. 716-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How master frames mislead

T2 - The division and eclipse of nationalist movements in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan

AU - Markowitz, Lawrence

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - This article examines how a successful master frame in one location can promote mobilization failure in another by misleading movement entrepreneurs. It revisits two cases of low nationalist mobilization in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to demonstrate that a fuller explanation should include the tactical choices - good and bad - of movement leaders. In both cases, a transnational anti-imperial master frame misled separatist nationalists, causing them to undervalue critical shifts in the political environments in their republics. In Uzbekistan, this frame left the Birlik nationalist movement open to division by the state in the aftermath of inter-ethnic violence, while it made Tajikistan's Rastokhez movement susceptible to eclipse by regionalist mobilization in Tajikistan.

AB - This article examines how a successful master frame in one location can promote mobilization failure in another by misleading movement entrepreneurs. It revisits two cases of low nationalist mobilization in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to demonstrate that a fuller explanation should include the tactical choices - good and bad - of movement leaders. In both cases, a transnational anti-imperial master frame misled separatist nationalists, causing them to undervalue critical shifts in the political environments in their republics. In Uzbekistan, this frame left the Birlik nationalist movement open to division by the state in the aftermath of inter-ethnic violence, while it made Tajikistan's Rastokhez movement susceptible to eclipse by regionalist mobilization in Tajikistan.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449348219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449348219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01419870801961508

DO - 10.1080/01419870801961508

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70449348219

VL - 32

SP - 716

EP - 738

JO - Ethnic and Racial Studies

JF - Ethnic and Racial Studies

SN - 0141-9870

IS - 4

ER -