Abstract
Purpose of the Study: This study examines the effect of survey context on self-reported rates of personal fraud victimization, and explores if the effect is influenced by age and gender. Design and Methods: Participants (3,000 U.S. adults) were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 versions of a fraud victimization questionnaire: questions about fraud were identical across conditions, however, the context varies. One questionnaire asked about crime, one about consumer buying experiences, and a third focused only on fraud. Results: Participants who were asked about fraud victimization in the context of crime reported significantly less victimization (p < .05) than those in the fraud-alone condition, yet the number of reports from those asked within the context of a consumer survey did not differ from the fraud-alone condition. The effect of the crime context interacted with age (p < .05), such that there was no effect of survey context for the middle age group (35-64), and a strong effect for younger (25-34) and older (65 plus) adults. The combined effect of being female and older was associated with the greatest effect of crime context on self-reported fraud victimization. Implications: These findings inform the production of new surveys and guide the development of effective social and health policies.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 329-340 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Gerontologist |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Gerontology
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How does survey context impact self-reported fraud victimization?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Equipment
-
New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging (NJISA)
Anita Chopra (Manager), Elyse Perweiler (Other), Rachel Pruchno (Other) & Robert Nagele (Other)
Geriatric - NJISAEquipment/facility: Facility