TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthcare worker feedback on duodenoscope reprocessing workflow and ergonomics
AU - Sivek, Amanda D.
AU - Davis, James
AU - Tremoulet, Patrice
AU - Smith, Mairead
AU - Lavanchy, Chris
AU - Sparnon, Erin
AU - Kommala, Dheerendra
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the respondents who completed our survey. We thank Ann Ferriter and Dr. Shani Haugen from FDA's Office of Product Evaluation and Quality for reviewing the survey and manuscript drafts. We gratefully acknowledge Susan Klacik and Natalie Lind from Healthcare Sterile Processing Association (f.k.a. International Association of Healthcare Central Service Materiel Management) for distributing the survey link to relevant members. We thank our colleagues Dr. Jeremy Suggs for statistical support and Hillary Hei for reviewing the manuscript draft.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background: The objectives of this survey study were to assess duodenoscope precleaning and manual cleaning times, identify human factors issues in duodenoscope reprocessing workflow or ergonomics, and ascertain any best practices in duodenoscope reprocessing. Methods: Researchers developed the confidential, qualitative, online Duodenoscope Reprocessing Workflow and Ergonomic Design Human Factors Survey with an intended audience of healthcare workers (HCWs) who routinely perform duodenoscope precleaning or manual cleaning. The unrestricted survey link was distributed to target HCW email addresses in December 2020; the survey closed in January 2021. Results: Three hundred and forty-one individuals completed the survey. Most respondents complete duodenoscope precleaning in 10 minutes or less and manual cleaning in 16-to-30 minutes. Most respondents’ facilities use fixed distal endcap duodenoscopes. Most respondents experience pressure to work faster when cleaning duodenoscopes and reported that cleaning duodenoscopes caused fatigue or discomfort in at least one body part. Mentoring HCWs and retaining experienced staff were 2 primary duodenoscope reprocessing best practices identified by respondents. Discussion and Conclusions: To enhance duodenoscope cleaning, facilities should provide ample reprocessing work spaces with incorporated height-adjustable work surfaces, train HCWs on validated duodenoscope reprocessing instructions, provide step-by-step instructions for HCWs when duodenoscope cleaning is performed, mentor reprocessing HCWs, and retain experienced staff.
AB - Background: The objectives of this survey study were to assess duodenoscope precleaning and manual cleaning times, identify human factors issues in duodenoscope reprocessing workflow or ergonomics, and ascertain any best practices in duodenoscope reprocessing. Methods: Researchers developed the confidential, qualitative, online Duodenoscope Reprocessing Workflow and Ergonomic Design Human Factors Survey with an intended audience of healthcare workers (HCWs) who routinely perform duodenoscope precleaning or manual cleaning. The unrestricted survey link was distributed to target HCW email addresses in December 2020; the survey closed in January 2021. Results: Three hundred and forty-one individuals completed the survey. Most respondents complete duodenoscope precleaning in 10 minutes or less and manual cleaning in 16-to-30 minutes. Most respondents’ facilities use fixed distal endcap duodenoscopes. Most respondents experience pressure to work faster when cleaning duodenoscopes and reported that cleaning duodenoscopes caused fatigue or discomfort in at least one body part. Mentoring HCWs and retaining experienced staff were 2 primary duodenoscope reprocessing best practices identified by respondents. Discussion and Conclusions: To enhance duodenoscope cleaning, facilities should provide ample reprocessing work spaces with incorporated height-adjustable work surfaces, train HCWs on validated duodenoscope reprocessing instructions, provide step-by-step instructions for HCWs when duodenoscope cleaning is performed, mentor reprocessing HCWs, and retain experienced staff.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125454228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125454228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 35108583
AN - SCOPUS:85125454228
SN - 0196-6553
VL - 50
SP - 1038
EP - 1048
JO - American Journal of Infection Control
JF - American Journal of Infection Control
IS - 9
ER -