TY - JOUR
T1 - Features of instructional talk predictive of reading comprehension
AU - Michener, Catherine J.
AU - Patrick Proctor, C.
AU - Silverman, Rebecca D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The research reported here was funded by a grant from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, to the University of Maryland (No. R305A090152); Silverman (PI), Proctor (co-PI), and Harring (co-PI). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. The authors would like to thank Gina Biancarosa and María Estela Brisk for feedback on early versions of this study, the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, and the teachers and students who generously shared their classrooms and learning with us.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Increasingly, reading research has begun to address how students’ linguistic environments may explain their reading achievement. In this exploratory analysis, we investigated how the rates of specific instructional talk moves predicted student reading comprehension achievement. Transcripts from third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade classrooms (teacher n = 31; student n = 236), were coded for nine talk moves established in the literature as involved in literacy and learning outcomes. Two-level hierarchical linear modeling was used to identify sources of linguistic comprehension, a necessary component of student reading comprehension. Controlling for students’ decoding and fluency, semantic-syntactic knowledge, and initial reading comprehension, we found two talk moves significantly predicted reading comprehension. Teacher explanations [γ07(20.89); p ≤ 0.05] and simple follow-up moves [γ06(10.44); p ≤ 0.05] provided students with explicit instruction and exposure to academic language and the positive reinforcement to encourage student attention to the learning tasks and thus potentially more language exposure. In this sample, these moves provide further support for the simple view of reading (Hoover & Gough, 1990) that suggests that fostering student linguistic comprehension is pedagogically important for student reading at these levels.
AB - Increasingly, reading research has begun to address how students’ linguistic environments may explain their reading achievement. In this exploratory analysis, we investigated how the rates of specific instructional talk moves predicted student reading comprehension achievement. Transcripts from third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade classrooms (teacher n = 31; student n = 236), were coded for nine talk moves established in the literature as involved in literacy and learning outcomes. Two-level hierarchical linear modeling was used to identify sources of linguistic comprehension, a necessary component of student reading comprehension. Controlling for students’ decoding and fluency, semantic-syntactic knowledge, and initial reading comprehension, we found two talk moves significantly predicted reading comprehension. Teacher explanations [γ07(20.89); p ≤ 0.05] and simple follow-up moves [γ06(10.44); p ≤ 0.05] provided students with explicit instruction and exposure to academic language and the positive reinforcement to encourage student attention to the learning tasks and thus potentially more language exposure. In this sample, these moves provide further support for the simple view of reading (Hoover & Gough, 1990) that suggests that fostering student linguistic comprehension is pedagogically important for student reading at these levels.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035123323&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035123323&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11145-017-9807-4
DO - 10.1007/s11145-017-9807-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85035123323
SN - 0922-4777
VL - 31
SP - 725
EP - 756
JO - Reading and Writing
JF - Reading and Writing
IS - 3
ER -