TY - GEN
T1 - Exploring student facility with “goes like” reasoning in introductory physics
AU - Zimmerman, Charlotte
AU - Olsho, Alexis
AU - Brahmia, Suzanne White
AU - Boudreaux, Andrew
AU - Smith, Trevor
AU - Eaton, Philip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, American Association of Physics Teachers. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Covariational reasoning—reasoning about how changes in one quantity relate to changes in another quantity—has been examined extensively in mathematics education research. Little research has been done, however, on covariational reasoning in introductory physics contexts. We explore one aspect of covariational reasoning: “goes like” reasoning. “Goes like” reasoning refers to ways physicists relate two quantities through a simplified function. For example, physicists often say that “the electric field goes like one over r squared.” While this reasoning mode is used regularly by physicists and physics instructors, how students make sense of and use it remains unclear. We present evidence from reasoning inventory items which indicate that many students are sense making with tools from prior math instruction that could be developed into expert “goes like” thinking with direct instruction. Recommendations for further work in characterizing student sense making as a foundation for future development of instruction are made.
AB - Covariational reasoning—reasoning about how changes in one quantity relate to changes in another quantity—has been examined extensively in mathematics education research. Little research has been done, however, on covariational reasoning in introductory physics contexts. We explore one aspect of covariational reasoning: “goes like” reasoning. “Goes like” reasoning refers to ways physicists relate two quantities through a simplified function. For example, physicists often say that “the electric field goes like one over r squared.” While this reasoning mode is used regularly by physicists and physics instructors, how students make sense of and use it remains unclear. We present evidence from reasoning inventory items which indicate that many students are sense making with tools from prior math instruction that could be developed into expert “goes like” thinking with direct instruction. Recommendations for further work in characterizing student sense making as a foundation for future development of instruction are made.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113934002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113934002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Zimmerman
DO - 10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Zimmerman
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85113934002
SN - 9781931024372
T3 - Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings
SP - 605
EP - 610
BT - Physics Education Research Conference, PERC 2020
A2 - Wolf, Steven
A2 - Bennett, Michael
A2 - Frank, Brian
PB - American Association of Physics Teachers
T2 - Physics Education Research Conference, PERC 2020
Y2 - 22 July 2020 through 23 July 2020
ER -