Everyday action in dementia: Evidence for differential deficits in Alzheimer's disease versus subcortical vascular dementia

Tania Giovannetti, Kara S. Schmidt, Jennifer L. Gallo, Nicole Sestito, David J. Libon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

The relationship between dementia diagnosis and everyday action (e.g., meal preparation, grooming) is not well understood. This study examines differences between individuals diagnosed with vascular dementia (VaD; n=25) versus Alzheimer's disease (AD; n=23) on the Naturalistic Action Test (NAT; Schwartz et al., 2003), a performance-based measure that includes three tasks of increasing complexity. The percentage of task steps accomplished, number of errors, and performance times were recorded for each task. While the groups did not differ in dementia severity or overall impairment on the NAT, the VaD group committed more errors (3.3 vs. 1.6, p=02). The VaD group also accomplished significantly fewer steps when salient distractor objects were present (74.0% vs. 91.3%, p < 01). Correlations between NAT variables and neuropsychological tests suggest the executive control deficits associated with VaD may contribute to specific action difficulties, such as distractor interference and inefficient, error-prone action on complex tasks. In AD, everyday action may be negatively influenced by episodic memory failures. Thus, dementia diagnosis has relevance to everyday function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-53
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Everyday action in dementia: Evidence for differential deficits in Alzheimer's disease versus subcortical vascular dementia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this