Evaluation of Impact of Mixing Method on Laboratory- and Plant-Produced Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixture

Ali Raza Khan, Ayman Ali, Harshdutta Pandya, Yusuf Mehta, Mohamed Elshaer, Christopher Decarlo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The addition of fibers to asphalt mixtures has the potential to improve the resistance of asphalt mixtures to cracking and permanent deformation (rutting). However, the state (distribution) of fibers in the asphalt mix is critical parameter in determining performance enhancement. This study evaluated the impact of different laboratory mixing methods (mainly Hobart and bucket) on fiber distribution and selected a method comparable to plant-produced fiber-reinforced mixes. The laboratory performance of plant-mixed lab-compacted (PMLC) and labmixed lab-compacted (LMLC) fiber-reinforced mixtures was compared. Four types of laboratory and plant mixtures [unreinforced, polyolefin and aramid (PFA) fibers at 0.05% dosage, and Sasobit-coated aramid (SCA) fibers at 0.01% and 0.02% dosages] were produced to compare the laboratory performance of asphalt mixtures. The cracking resistance [evaluated using indirect tensile strength (ITS) and semicircular bend (SCB) tests], rutting susceptibility [evaluated using flow number (FN) and the Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT)], durability (evaluated using Cantabro loss), and fatigue (evaluated using a uniaxial fatigue test) performance of control and fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures were evaluated. Among laboratory mixing methods, a bucket mixer was selected to produce LMLC samples because it produced the maximum fiber distribution (87% of fibers in the individual state). Laboratory performance testing results showed that PFA-reinforced mixtures enhanced the rutting performance regardless of mixing method. The mixtures with PFA 0.05% and SCA 0.01% fibers were highly durable and had better dynamic modulus (|E∗|) at low frequency and high temperature. Cracking performance was improved with the addition of SCA fibers into the mix; however, fiber-reinforced mixes (PFA 0.05% and SCA 0.01%) had higher fatigue damage tolerance, except SCA 0.02% reinforced mix. The laboratory bucket mixing method is representative of plant-produced fiber-reinforced mixtures, and laboratory performance results were consistent for laboratory bucket and plant produced mixtures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04024009
JournalJournal of Transportation Engineering Part B: Pavements
Volume150
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2024
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Transportation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Impact of Mixing Method on Laboratory- and Plant-Produced Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this