TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective deaf access to justice
AU - Elder, Brent C.
AU - Schwartz, Michael A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors began planning the project and received two grants from Syracuse University to fund the study. Shortly thereafter, they received institutional review board (IRB) approval. Schwartz recruited eight participants through e-mail exchanges with his extensive network within the Deaf community in Northern Ireland. Participants were selected for their
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - This article reports on findings from a qualitative study that explored the experiences of eight deaf participants in interacting with the justice system in Northern Ireland. The study was spurred by anecdotal evidence of challenges facing members of the Deaf community in obtaining access to solicitors. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, to which the United Kingdom is a State Party, requires providers of goods, facilities, and services, which include solicitors, to provide effective communication access to deaf people seeking their services on an equal basis with non-disabled people. The Disability Discrimination Act comes into play, requiring service providers like solicitors to make a "reasonable adjustment" in order to provide access to deaf clients. Eight participants provided narratives from which three thematic categories emerged: (a) Barriers to Access, (b) The Contested Meaning of "Reasonable Adjustment," and (c) Deaf Cultural Awareness.
AB - This article reports on findings from a qualitative study that explored the experiences of eight deaf participants in interacting with the justice system in Northern Ireland. The study was spurred by anecdotal evidence of challenges facing members of the Deaf community in obtaining access to solicitors. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, to which the United Kingdom is a State Party, requires providers of goods, facilities, and services, which include solicitors, to provide effective communication access to deaf people seeking their services on an equal basis with non-disabled people. The Disability Discrimination Act comes into play, requiring service providers like solicitors to make a "reasonable adjustment" in order to provide access to deaf clients. Eight participants provided narratives from which three thematic categories emerged: (a) Barriers to Access, (b) The Contested Meaning of "Reasonable Adjustment," and (c) Deaf Cultural Awareness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053529396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053529396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/deafed/eny023
DO - 10.1093/deafed/eny023
M3 - Article
C2 - 29982503
AN - SCOPUS:85053529396
SN - 1081-4159
VL - 23
SP - 331
EP - 340
JO - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
JF - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
IS - 4
ER -