Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons

Gregory J. Madden, Bethany R. Raiff, Carla H. Lagorio, Andrea M. Begotka, Angela M. Mueller, Daniel J. Hehli, Ashley A. Wegener

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

211 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prior studies comparing discounting of delayed hypothetical or potentially real rewards have reported no differences, but they used within-subjects designs. This raises the possibility that participants remembered their choices in one condition and repeated them in the other. In Experiment 1, between-subjects comparisons were made with an adjusting-amount procedure. No significant effect of reward type on delay discounting was detected. Experiment 2 increased the proportion of real rewards and made between- and within-subject comparisons. These comparisons also failed to reveal a significant effect of reward type. Although these findings are consistent with prior findings, caution is urged because choices involving hypothetical rewards have yet to be compared with choices involving real rewards (i.e., the consequences of every choice are obtained) in an experiment using forced-choice trials and steady-state methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-261
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this