Abstract
Caregiver–child dyads exist within systems that may reinforce and/or establish structures to support holistic needs, awareness of roles, and capacity-building efforts. Systems can be challenged in fortifying such structures, however, following substantiated abuse and/or neglect. In the current study, the author surveyed 27 family court judges and judicial hearing officers collectively presiding over ~2800 birth-5 cases (~39% response) in one Mid-Atlantic state in the United States. Despite court-level stakeholders’ pivotal role in reunification, it is unclear how they perceive current processes, existing barriers, and proposed initiatives targeting emotional development post-abuse and/or neglect. Findings and implications are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 272-296 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Child Welfare |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Court-level stakeholders’ reunification decisions and perceived role in parents’ readiness to support early emotional development post-abuse and/or neglect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver