TY - JOUR
T1 - Concomitant Precipitation of Solid-State Miscible Product-Impurity Phases in Solution Crystallization - Part 2
T2 - Industrial Case Studies
AU - Nordstrom, Fredrik L.
AU - Paolello, Mitchell
AU - Yao, Na
AU - Armiger, Travis
AU - Jiang, Qi
AU - Nicholson, James
AU - Kratz, Joseph
AU - Toresco, Michael
AU - Lipp, Alexander
AU - Witte, Swjatoslaw
AU - Henry, Manuel
AU - Shultz, C. Scott
AU - Sirota, Eric
AU - Capellades, Gerard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2024/2/16
Y1 - 2024/2/16
N2 - Three industrial case studies are presented from the pharmaceutical companies Boehringer-Ingelheim and Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, NJ) demonstrating how solid-state miscible impurities can coprecipitate during scale-up of crystallizations resulting in significant purity challenges. This second part contribution outlines how the underlying impurity retention mechanism was identified via the Solubility-Limited Impurity Purge (SLIP) test, which allowed the project teams to establish appropriate mechanism-based root-causes. The workflow and thermodynamic model introduced in part 1 of this paper series were used to guide the teams toward finding thermodynamically robust solutions for this previously unreported impurity retention mechanism. Different approaches were employed based on the prevailing solid-state miscibility, solid form landscapes, and solvent solubilities. In the first case study, an impurity present at 6% could be purged in a single crystallization by switching the crystal form. In case studies 2 and 3, solvent switches enabled the teams to reject precipitating impurities originally present at 14% and 3.5%, respectively. The presented examples showcase how mechanistic understanding of impurity retention in crystallization can be used to arrive at thermodynamically robust solutions while saving time and resources.
AB - Three industrial case studies are presented from the pharmaceutical companies Boehringer-Ingelheim and Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, NJ) demonstrating how solid-state miscible impurities can coprecipitate during scale-up of crystallizations resulting in significant purity challenges. This second part contribution outlines how the underlying impurity retention mechanism was identified via the Solubility-Limited Impurity Purge (SLIP) test, which allowed the project teams to establish appropriate mechanism-based root-causes. The workflow and thermodynamic model introduced in part 1 of this paper series were used to guide the teams toward finding thermodynamically robust solutions for this previously unreported impurity retention mechanism. Different approaches were employed based on the prevailing solid-state miscibility, solid form landscapes, and solvent solubilities. In the first case study, an impurity present at 6% could be purged in a single crystallization by switching the crystal form. In case studies 2 and 3, solvent switches enabled the teams to reject precipitating impurities originally present at 14% and 3.5%, respectively. The presented examples showcase how mechanistic understanding of impurity retention in crystallization can be used to arrive at thermodynamically robust solutions while saving time and resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184779916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85184779916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00406
DO - 10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00406
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85184779916
SN - 1083-6160
VL - 28
SP - 388
EP - 403
JO - Organic Process Research and Development
JF - Organic Process Research and Development
IS - 2
ER -