TY - JOUR
T1 - Compounding risk
T2 - An examination of associations between spirituality/religiosity, drinking motives, and alcohol-related ambivalence among heavy drinking young adults
AU - Foster, Dawn W.
AU - Young, Chelsie M.
AU - Bryan, Jennifer L.
AU - Quist, Michelle C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Objectives The present study assessed combinations of spirituality/religiosity (S/R), a known protective factor against heavy drinking, with drinking motives, and alcohol-related ambivalence to better understand how these factors interrelate and are associated with drinking and alcohol-related problems. Methods Participants were 241 heavy drinking undergraduate students (81.74% female; Mage = 23.48 years; SD = 5.50) who completed study questionnaires online. Results Coping, enhancement, and conformity drinking motives were associated with greater alcohol use and problems, however there were no main effects of either ambivalence or S/R on alcohol outcomes. S/R interacted with ambivalence with respect to drinking and problems. S/R also interacted with conformity drinking motives with respect to drinking and problems. Further, ambivalence interacted with conformity drinking motives regarding problems. Three-way interactions emerged between ambivalence, S/R, and drinking motives (social, coping, and enhancement motives) regarding drinking and problems. Results show that individuals at highest risk for problematic drinking are those who more strongly endorse drinking motives, are low in S/R, and high in ambivalence. Conclusions Findings supported hypotheses and provide support for clusters of individual difference factors that put heavy drinking college students at higher risk for problematic drinking. These examinations have practical utility and may inform development and implementation of interventions and programs targeting alcohol misuse among heavy drinking undergraduate students.
AB - Objectives The present study assessed combinations of spirituality/religiosity (S/R), a known protective factor against heavy drinking, with drinking motives, and alcohol-related ambivalence to better understand how these factors interrelate and are associated with drinking and alcohol-related problems. Methods Participants were 241 heavy drinking undergraduate students (81.74% female; Mage = 23.48 years; SD = 5.50) who completed study questionnaires online. Results Coping, enhancement, and conformity drinking motives were associated with greater alcohol use and problems, however there were no main effects of either ambivalence or S/R on alcohol outcomes. S/R interacted with ambivalence with respect to drinking and problems. S/R also interacted with conformity drinking motives with respect to drinking and problems. Further, ambivalence interacted with conformity drinking motives regarding problems. Three-way interactions emerged between ambivalence, S/R, and drinking motives (social, coping, and enhancement motives) regarding drinking and problems. Results show that individuals at highest risk for problematic drinking are those who more strongly endorse drinking motives, are low in S/R, and high in ambivalence. Conclusions Findings supported hypotheses and provide support for clusters of individual difference factors that put heavy drinking college students at higher risk for problematic drinking. These examinations have practical utility and may inform development and implementation of interventions and programs targeting alcohol misuse among heavy drinking undergraduate students.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977596229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977596229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.026
DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 27393932
AN - SCOPUS:84977596229
SN - 0306-4603
VL - 63
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Addictive Behaviors
JF - Addictive Behaviors
ER -