TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of haplotype-based tests for detecting gene-environment interactions with rare variants
AU - Papachristou, Charalampos
AU - Biswas, Swati
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5/21
Y1 - 2020/5/21
N2 - Dissecting the genetic mechanism underlying a complex disease hinges on discovering gene-environment interactions (GXE). However, detecting GXE is a challenging problem especially when the genetic variants under study are rare. Haplotype-based tests have several advantages over the so-called collapsing tests for detecting rare variants as highlighted in recent literature. Thus, it is of practical interest to compare haplotype-based tests for detecting GXE including the recent ones developed specifically for rare haplotypes. We compare the following methods: haplo.glm, hapassoc, HapReg, Bayesian hierarchical generalized linear model (BhGLM) and logistic Bayesian LASSO (LBL). We simulate data under different types of association scenarios and levels of gene-environment dependence. We find that when the type I error rates are controlled to be the same for all methods, LBL is the most powerful method for detecting GXE. We applied the methods to a lung cancer data set, in particular, in region 15q25.1 as it has been suggested in the literature that it interacts with smoking to affect the lung cancer susceptibility and that it is associated with smoking behavior. LBL and BhGLM were able to detect a rare haplotype-smoking interaction in this region. We also analyzed the sequence data from the Dallas Heart Study, a population-based multi-ethnic study. Specifically, we considered haplotype blocks in the gene ANGPTL4 for association with trait serum triglyceride and used ethnicity as a covariate. Only LBL found interactions of haplotypes with race (Hispanic). Thus, in general, LBL seems to be the best method for detecting GXE among the ones we studied here. Nonetheless, it requires the most computation time.
AB - Dissecting the genetic mechanism underlying a complex disease hinges on discovering gene-environment interactions (GXE). However, detecting GXE is a challenging problem especially when the genetic variants under study are rare. Haplotype-based tests have several advantages over the so-called collapsing tests for detecting rare variants as highlighted in recent literature. Thus, it is of practical interest to compare haplotype-based tests for detecting GXE including the recent ones developed specifically for rare haplotypes. We compare the following methods: haplo.glm, hapassoc, HapReg, Bayesian hierarchical generalized linear model (BhGLM) and logistic Bayesian LASSO (LBL). We simulate data under different types of association scenarios and levels of gene-environment dependence. We find that when the type I error rates are controlled to be the same for all methods, LBL is the most powerful method for detecting GXE. We applied the methods to a lung cancer data set, in particular, in region 15q25.1 as it has been suggested in the literature that it interacts with smoking to affect the lung cancer susceptibility and that it is associated with smoking behavior. LBL and BhGLM were able to detect a rare haplotype-smoking interaction in this region. We also analyzed the sequence data from the Dallas Heart Study, a population-based multi-ethnic study. Specifically, we considered haplotype blocks in the gene ANGPTL4 for association with trait serum triglyceride and used ethnicity as a covariate. Only LBL found interactions of haplotypes with race (Hispanic). Thus, in general, LBL seems to be the best method for detecting GXE among the ones we studied here. Nonetheless, it requires the most computation time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073823384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073823384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bib/bbz031
DO - 10.1093/bib/bbz031
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31329820
AN - SCOPUS:85073823384
SN - 1467-5463
VL - 21
SP - 851
EP - 862
JO - Briefings in bioinformatics
JF - Briefings in bioinformatics
IS - 3
ER -