Cognitive-developmental and behavior-analytic theories: Evolving into complementarity

Willis F. Overton, Michelle D. Ennis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Historically, cognitive-developmental and behavior-analytic approaches to the study of human behavior change and development have been presented as incompatible alternative theoretical and methodological perspectives. This presumed incompatibility has been understood as arising from divergent sets of metatheoretical assumptions that take the form of ontological and epistemological principles, and constitute worldviews. Classically, cognitive-developmental approaches have been cast as deriving from an organ ismic worldview and behavior-analytic approaches from a contextualist worldview. Previous attempts at uniting the two approaches have entailed privileging one and radically modifying the other. The present paper argues that a meaningful integration requires a set of metatheoretical assumptions that transcends both worldviews, and, while maintaining their distinct qualities, unites them. This metatheoretical framework termed relational metatheory is described and its integrative implications explained.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-172
Number of pages30
JournalHuman Development
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive-developmental and behavior-analytic theories: Evolving into complementarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this