Altered responsiveness of hypertrophied rat hearts to alpha- and beta-adrenergic stimulation

Karen A. Foster, Carl E. Hock, Diane K. Reibel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Inotropic responsiveness to α- and β-adrenergic agents was examined in pressure-overload hypertrophied rat hearts. Pressure overload was induced in rats by abdominal aortic constriction. Three weeks post-constriction, hearts were isolated and perfused with buffer containing various concentrations of (1) calcium (2) isoproterenol (3) forskolin, or (4) phenylephrine. The change in rate of left ventricular pressure development (Δ + dP dt) with increasing perfusate calcium concentrations was comparable in hypertrophied hearts of aortic-constricted rats (AC) and hearts of sham-operated rats (SO). However, with isoproterenol or forskolin stimulation, inotropic responsiveness (Δ + dP dt) was 50% lower in hypertrophied hearts of AC. This was associated with significantly lower tissue cAMP levels. Beta-adrenoceptor number and affinity were unchanged in the hypertrophied myocardium. Maximum inotropic responsiveness to phenylephrine was also lower in hypertrophied hearts and was associated with reduced α-adrenoceptor numbers. The data suggest that altered inotropic responsiveness to α-adrenergic stimulation may, in part, be due to reduced cardiac α-adrenoceptor density. However, post-receptor mechanisms including alterations in cAMP metabolism may contribute to the reduced responsiveness to β-adrenergic stimulation in hypertrophied hearts of AC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-101
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1991
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Altered responsiveness of hypertrophied rat hearts to alpha- and beta-adrenergic stimulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this