TY - JOUR
T1 - Age specific behavioral responses of odonate larvae to chemical and visual cues from predators
AU - Crumrine, Patrick W.
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Philip Crowley and Andrew Sih for their support and guidance during this study, Jason Rohr for helpful comments on the experimental design, and Melissa Zwick for her encouragement and logistical support. I thank Kara Moubray for her help in developing this project. This work was funded by a grant from the Ribble Research Fund at the University of Kentucky and National Science Foundation grant DEB-0206549 to Patrick Crumrine and Philip Crowley.
PY - 2006/3
Y1 - 2006/3
N2 - Many aquatic organisms possess the ability to detect and respond to visual and chemical cues from predators and injured conspecifics, but relatively few studies have investigated if those responses change during development in odonates. In a laboratory experiment, I exposed 8th and 12th instar larvae of the dragonfly Anax junius to (1) the presence of a free-swimming fish predator (Lepomis macrochirus); (2) water that recently contained L. macrochirus; (3) water that contained crushed conspecifics; (4) water that recently contained living conspecifics; and (5) charcoal filtered tap water that contained no visual or chemical stimuli. The 12th instar A. junius moved more often, spent more time moving and spent less time perched on artificial aquatic vegetation than did 8th instar A. junius. A. junius moved less in the presence offish chemical cues relative to the control. Although 8th and 12th instar A. junius differed in their responses to stimuli from predators, the overall response of A. junius to predators was not strong. The characteristic high activity level of A. junius, which is an advantage in fishless habitats, may limit success of this species in habitats with insectivorous fish.
AB - Many aquatic organisms possess the ability to detect and respond to visual and chemical cues from predators and injured conspecifics, but relatively few studies have investigated if those responses change during development in odonates. In a laboratory experiment, I exposed 8th and 12th instar larvae of the dragonfly Anax junius to (1) the presence of a free-swimming fish predator (Lepomis macrochirus); (2) water that recently contained L. macrochirus; (3) water that contained crushed conspecifics; (4) water that recently contained living conspecifics; and (5) charcoal filtered tap water that contained no visual or chemical stimuli. The 12th instar A. junius moved more often, spent more time moving and spent less time perched on artificial aquatic vegetation than did 8th instar A. junius. A. junius moved less in the presence offish chemical cues relative to the control. Although 8th and 12th instar A. junius differed in their responses to stimuli from predators, the overall response of A. junius to predators was not strong. The characteristic high activity level of A. junius, which is an advantage in fishless habitats, may limit success of this species in habitats with insectivorous fish.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645376962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645376962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02705060.2006.9664090
DO - 10.1080/02705060.2006.9664090
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33645376962
SN - 0270-5060
VL - 21
SP - 9
EP - 16
JO - Journal of Freshwater Ecology
JF - Journal of Freshwater Ecology
IS - 1
ER -